Forensic science paper Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

rhetorical science paper - Essay ExampleFrom this article, it is clear that polar knowledge and expertise of professionals in different crystallises can be used collaboratively to bring valid results. In trauma identification, physical anthropologists and forensic pathologists nominate different knowledge and expertise, though slightly related. The forensic anthropologists are trained in investigating age, sex, ancestry, and musical accompaniment stature of remains. They can also perform postmortem trauma identification. In as much as they can interpret trauma, forensic anthropologists are not fully responsible for the whole process. They collaboratively work with the forensic pathologists.Forensic anthropologists have the expertise in soft tissue wound interpretation, investigating demolition, and cause of death analysis therefore, their results are integrated with those of forensic pathologists for a final interpretation. Forensic pathologists are the most authoritative in the whole process since they are responsible for determining the results and validity of the results. They are also in charge of interpreting the medicolegal aspects of a case. This instance indicates that in collaborative work, one group may be the most important depending on the nature of the study undertaken. However, this cannot undermine the separate less influential group, since its contribution to the study still matters.The article also brings out the impact of cross-disciplinary collaboration on other disciplines. The collaboration between forensic anthropologists and forensic pathologists in trauma interpretation is useful in the discipline of law, as the findings help in resolving medicolegal and crime cases. In these cases, forensic anthropologists can regard skeletal anatomy and taphonomic processes of human remains to determine cause and manner of death. Forensic pathologists do final pathological examination, interpretations, and the conclusions, before presentati on to the court. To further prove the